Discover the reasons behind the significant `time difference` between two C+ + code samples that handle string comparison. Learn about time complexity, memory allocation, and optimization strategies.
---
This video is based on the question stackoverflow.com/q/75928322/ asked by the user 'cppNewbie' ( stackoverflow.com/u/20798424/ ) and on the answer stackoverflow.com/a/75928788/ provided by the user 'Jakob Stark' ( stackoverflow.com/u/17862371/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: How different in the time complexity between these two code?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA meta.stackexchange.com/help/licensing
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding the Time Complexity Differences in Two C+ + Code Samples

As a student of algorithms, you may have come across scenarios where two pieces of code solve the same problem but exhibit vastly different performance characteristics. A common query arises: how can two codes handle similar tasks yet have such a dramatic difference in execution time? This guide delves into one such example involving string manipulation in C+ + , shedding light on the underlying factors that influence their time complexity.

The Problem

Consider the following two code snippets, both designed to check if a substring of a given string matches a specific pattern ("IOI"). Despite their similar objectives, their performance drastically differs.

Code Samples

Code Snippet 1 (Slower):

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Code Snippet 2 (Faster):

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The first code snippet is significantly slower, especially when dealing with larger strings (lengths up to 1,000,000). But why does such a time difference exist? Let's break down the solutions to this apparent dilemma.

Analyzing the Time Complexity

1. String Copying Overhead

The most notable distinction between the two snippets is how they handle string arguments:

Code Snippet 1 passes the string to the cutstring function by value. This means that every time cutstring is called, the entire string must be copied. For large strings, this copying process can become extremely resource-intensive, as it involves allocating new memory and duplicating the string contents.

Suggested Improvement: Passing the string by reference instead (string const& str) could help mitigate this overhead, as it avoids unnecessary copying.

2. Memory Allocation and String Expansion

The first code snippet also creates a new string variable cup and expands it within a loop. During this process, if the platform does not utilize small string optimization, the following issues may arise:

Multiple memory allocations and reallocations during the string construction, which can further contribute to a slowdown in performance.

Overall, unnecessary copying and merging operations within the loop can compound the execution time.

3. Direct Access in the Second Snippet

The second code directly accesses the required characters within the string using indices:

This approach eliminates the need for additional allocations, copying, or expansions, making it intrinsically faster since it directly performs comparisons instead.

Time Complexity vs. Actual Performance

It's essential to emphasize that while both codes may share the same theoretical time complexity (e.g., O(1) for constant time vs O(n) in more general cases), the determinant of actual performance goes beyond just mathematical notation. Here’s why:

Constant Factors: When actual runtimes differ significantly despite having the same theoretical complexity, it serves to illustrate how constant factors in runtime can heavily influence performance. Code efficiency relies as much on how resources are managed as it does on algorithm efficiency.

Compiler Optimization: When measuring performance, the compiler, its flags, and the programming environment all play crucial roles. For accurate benchmarks, documenting compilation settings is vital to provide context to any performance analysis.

Conclusion

Ultimately, understanding the reasons behind the time difference between these two C+ + code samples boils down to the choices made in string handling, memory management, and direct data access. Small changes can lead to substantial performance improvements. By comparing these two snippets, you can